Page 100 - March-2015-Life-in-Naples-Magazine
P. 100

Macular Degeneration

and Genetics: SHOULD YOU GET TESTED?

Aby Stephen G. Schwartz, MD, MBA                                                                                           DR. STEPHEN G. SCHWARTZ, MD, MBA
           ge-related macular degeneration is the
           leading cause of irreversible visual loss     order to accurately predict whether or not a patient will develop macular degeneration,
           among the elderly in the US. The causes       so at this time I do not recommend this test to my patients.
           of macular degeneration are poorly
understood but the disease does seem to run in              Patients who already have macular degeneration may benefit from a specific
families, which suggests that there may be a genetic     nutritional supplement, available over the counter under the names AREDS
(or hereditary) component. Genetic testing does          (standing for “Age-Related Eye Disease Study”) or AREDS 2. These supplements
exist for macular degeneration. Should patients have     contain antioxidants (including lutein or beta-carotene) as well as zinc. There is very
this testing performed?                                  good scientific evidence that AREDS or AREDS 2 supplements reduce the risk of
                                                         developing progressive disease in patients who already have macular degeneration.
   This is not a straightforward question. There         There is some evidence that the supplements do not work equally well in all patients,
are two major types of genetic diseases. The first is    and that some of this difference may be predicted by certain genetic risk variants.
called a simple genetic disease, in which there is a
single gene that determines whether or not a person         Should patients undergo genetic testing to determine whether they take
develops the disease. If the person has a “normal”       AREDS or some other supplement? This is an important question, because some
gene, then no disease develops, but if a patient has     recent scientific evidence suggests that genetic testing may be useful in order to
an “abnormal” gene, also called a mutation, then         predict which supplements are best for each individual patient. However, this
the disease may develop. Simple genetic diseases         recent scientific evidence (suggesting the use of genetic testing prior to starting
include cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs disease, sickle cell  supplementation) is not as strong as the original clinical trials that demonstrated
anemia, and others. Generally speaking, it makes         the efficacy of AREDS and AREDS 2. This is currently a controversial subject
more sense to recommend genetic testing for              among ophthalmologists. At this time, I do not recommend the use of routine
patients at risk for simple genetic diseases, because    genetic testing in patients with macular degeneration, in order to predict disease
the presence of a mutation suggests a high risk of       progression or to guide nutritional supplementation.
developing the disease.
                                                            In summary, there is a complex relationship between genetics and certain aspects
   The other type of genetic disease is called a         of macular degeneration. This is an important area of research, and Bascom Palmer
complex genetic disease, in which there are multiple     Eye Institute is participating in a long-range genetics research study to learn more
genes, plus environmental influences, that determine     about this relationship. However, at this time, I do not recommend routine genetic
whether or not a person develops the disease. This is    testing for patients with macular degeneration.
not a question of “normal” versus “abnormal” genes,
so physicians and scientists generally do not use the
word “mutation” in this situation. Instead, certain
“variants” of genes (often called “risk variants”)
are more likely to be associated with the onset of
disease. Generally speaking, it does not make sense
to recommend genetic testing for patients at risk for
complex genetic diseases, because the presence of
one or more risk variants does not necessarily mean
that a person will develop the disease.

   For example, there are at least 19 different
genes that are known to be associated with macular
degeneration. In addition, certain environmental
exposures, including cigarette smoking, and foods
(or vitamins) eaten, play a role. How many “risk
variants,” plus how many environmental exposures,
does it take to develop macular degeneration? At
this time, the answer is unknown. For these reasons,
genetic testing does not give sufficient information in

	100 											                                         Life in Naples | March 2015
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105